recallX

Memories that matter

RecallX records what a senior engineer actually knows — the pattern recognition built over thirty years of ground, drawings, and contractors — before it retires with them. Not by questionnaire: sessions are triggered by the expert's own artefacts, because recognition is easier than recall, and the good material only surfaces when the situation does.

What comes out is not a recording. It is a vault of bounded, cited statements — each one approved by the expert, linked to the moment they said it, and carrying the limits that make it safe to reuse. Their successors ask; the answers arrive with a voice attached.

Start a capture program →I've been invited →

The method

Eleven sessions over roughly eleven weeks, built on the Cognitive Interview — tested across 42 studies and ~2,500 interviewees. The easy material first; failure stories are never asked for before session five, and stay private until the expert says otherwise.

  1. S0Consent & scopenot recorded · 45 min
  2. S1Career map60 min
  3. S2Project inventory60 min
  4. S3Critical incident — a save90 min
  5. S4Critical incident — a contrast90 min
  6. S5Critical incident — a loss90 min · private
  7. S6Artefact deep dive90 min
  8. S7Literature challenge60 min
  9. S8Timed scenarios90 min
  10. S9Heuristics & their limits60 min
  11. S10Teach-back & review90 min

What you show determines what you get.

Questions are the weakest cue there is. The expert's own drawings, plots, and photographs are the strongest.

Inside the platform

Session 6 · artefact deep diveREC 01:12:04
offset · 44 ftJun 2011Mar

“Looking at this plot, what do you see first?”

The Session Room — the expert's own artefact does the remembering.
KU-2026-021407 · recognition cueapproved ✓

When an inclinometer shows a sharp offset at a consistent depth across consecutive surveys, and piezometric levels near that depth are rising, treat it as a reactivating shear surface until proven otherwise.

Limits & caveats

Not applicable to rockfill shells · assumes survey error ruled out

Specific 5 · Evidenced 4 · Testable 5 · Teachable 4 · Bounded 5

A knowledge unit — one claim, in his own words, with its limits attached.

“An inclinometer on our downstream slope shows an offset at 44 ft — what should I check?”

Verified · expert approved

Check the movement rate against the last survey, rule out casing error, and gauge pore pressure at the seam itself — not just at the crest.

▶ F. Alvarez · Session 6 · 00:12:40
The assistant — every answer cited back to a voice, or it abstains.

Who is learning from you

Your knowledge answered 34 questions this month.

A graduate engineer in Sacramento used your noncircular-search rule in a slope stability review on Tuesday.

212 knowledge units carrying your name

The reason experts keep showing up — a legacy, visible.

For the expert

This is a legacy, not a debrief — and the expert holds the pen. The rules never change, whatever they choose:

  • Every statement published in their name is approved by them first.
  • Anything can be withdrawn, at any time, without a reason — even after approval.
  • Stories about what went wrong stay private until they decide otherwise.

Have an invite? Begin here →